> To answer my own question, relooking at the proposal, RawRepresentable > wouldn’t be suitable for Bool, Character, UnicodeScalar, Integer, etc. > >> On 5 Jun 2016, at 7:20 PM, Patrick Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> (This raises a point — what’s the difference between the proposed >> LosslessStringConvertible and RawRepresentable where RawValue = String? They >> both have a failable init. Is it due to current limitations with typealiases >> that makes this hard?)
I would add that RawRepresentable does not promise the representation is human-readable. -- Brent Royal-Gordon Architechies _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
