If you add a new keyword called “none” without the period, but keep allowing 
“.none” to work because Optional is really an enum… then I don’t really see 
what has been gained here at all - you’re basically back to nil/.none => 2 ways 
to say the same thing!

l8r
Sean


> On Jun 8, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Brandon Knope via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> .none or a more appropriate keyword like “none” (imo)
> 
> Brandon
> 
>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> It's been pointed out before that Optional being an enum type is treated 
>> like an implementation detail. Currently, it is possible to teach the 
>> concept of Optional without introducing enum types or generics. How would 
>> you do so after elimination of nil?
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Антон Жилин <swift-evolution@swift.org> 
>> wrote:
>> (No joking)
>> Points:
>> 
>> 1. When nil was added to the language, we could not infer enumeration type:
>> if x != Optional.none { ... }
>> 
>> Now it looks like this:
>> if x != .none { ... }
>> 
>> If at this point we had a proposal to add nil as a replacement for .none, 
>> would we accept it?
>> 
>> 2. nil is very generic, it only approximately allows to express the 
>> intentions.
>> In case of Optional, .none is clearer. In case of JSON processing, .null is 
>> clearer. In case of a semantically nullable struct, NilLiteralConvertible 
>> usually goes to default constructor.
>> 
>> 3. Too many "empty" things: .none, nil; NSNull, Void, NoReturn types.
>> 
>> 4. There should be a single consistent terminology: no value in Swift equals 
>> none.
>> 
>> - Anton
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to