I'm starting to worry about the proposal, too. Any news? - Anton
2016-05-31 1:07 GMT+03:00 Антон Жилин <[email protected]>: > I assume that Core team is scheduling a discussion or already discussing > the proposal, and that really takes time in our case. > > In reply to Brent, I think that we can start requiring `public` if (when?) > operator visibility levels are added. > > - Anton > > 2016-05-24 13:53 GMT+03:00 Brent Royal-Gordon <[email protected]>: > >> > > Can you qualify them with module names? >> > Right now, I guess, no, although that would be nice to have. I agree >> that this can be discussed later. >> >> I wonder if we should force people today to put a `public` keyword on >> their `operator` and `precedence` (or whatever) declarations, so that when >> we eventually *do* stop doing the weird global thing we're currently doing, >> existing code won't break (as much). >> >> -- >> Brent Royal-Gordon >> Architechies > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
