> On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was referencing to the issue Robert discovered in his implementation. > > I do understand what the proposal is all about, but thank you for > re-clarifying that to me. :) > >
I don’t think it’s a bug, but it is definitely something that isn’t as clear as it should have been. > > > > -- > Adrian Zubarev > Sent with Airmail > > Am 15. Juni 2016 um 21:40:37, Matthew Johnson ([email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>) schrieb: > >> What seems like a nasty bug missed during review? I don’t follow you there. >> >> This proposal was specifically designed to follow Swift’s design of a >> scope-based access control mechanism rather than a type-based access control >> mechanism that is common in other languages. > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
