> On 22 Jun 2016, at 02:15, Shawn Erickson via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Curious on the possibility of something like the following to denote a no > return function? > > func foo() -> !
See "Diverging functions" in "The Rust Programming Language": <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/functions.html#diverging-functions> I suggested using an underscore, but a named type could work better with optional chaining: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/19715/focus=20000> -- Ben _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
