> On Jun 22, 2016, at 19:35, Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, David Sweeris <daveswee...@mac.com> wrote: >> That's a really interesting idea. Is "Syntax" a placeholder, or is that the >> intended name? > > It is the best name we could come up with, we are open to better suggestions.
I guess it depends on the intended semantics of the "namespace". If the purpose is to be a container for the various LiteralConvertible protocols, then maybe something like `AcceptsLiteralType.Integer` might be better? It's a bit wordy, though. >> Also, why an enum? Especially one without any cases... > > It is not possible to create an instance of an enum that does not have > cases. It becomes essentially a namespace. Oh that's a clever work-around. I like it :-) - Dave Sweeris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
