> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1 The protocols are well thought out and make total sense to me. I only have a miner gripe with the naming of:
func nthWord(n: Int) -> UInt Which reads very weird. Why not: func word(at: Int) -> UInt > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Yes, generic algorithms using integers were difficult to write. This is definitely needed for Swift 3. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? It follows the logic behind the floating-point protocols. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? No. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? A good read. > > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > > Thank you, > > -Chris Lattner > Review Manager > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
