+1 to the proposal On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 at 17:48 David Sweeris via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 25, 2016, at 05:06, Karl via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Proposal: https://gist.github.com/karwa/273db66cd8a5fe2c388ccc7de9c4cf31 > > > +1 > > The only thing I'm worried about is the situation where we have "x = N.M", > and `x.ceiling` equals maybe "(N+2).0" instead of "(N+1).0" because we ran > out of precision and can't represent (N+1).0. I'm not sure what the exact > values are where floats (or doubles) stop having enough precision to > represent inter-integer values... It might be a moot point. > > I'd suggest the functions' descriptions to be changed from > "[largest|smallest] integral value" to "[largest|smallest] representable > integral value". > > - Dave Sweeris > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
