> struct Foo {
> let bar: Int
>
> func getBar() -> Int {
> return self.bar
> }
>
> }
>
> let foos = [Foo(bar: 1), Foo(bar: 2), Foo(bar: 3)]
> let bars = foos.map(.getBar)
This can be done now:
let bars = foos.map(Foo.getBar)
> While for parameterless functions this might not seem like much of an
> improvement, I think it helps when there are parameters involved:
>
> struct Foo {
> let bar: Int
>
> func combine(other: Foo) -> Foo {
> return Foo(bar: other.bar + self.bar)
> }
> }
>
> let foos = [Foo(bar: 5), Foo(bar: 6), Foo(bar: 1)]
> let reduced = foos.reduce(Foo(bar: 0), .combine)
This also can be done now:
let reduced = foos.reduce(Foo(bar: 0), Foo.combine)
Are you suggesting to drop class name? That might make sense, but not
for Swift 3.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
