> On Jun 27, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>
> on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com
> <http://erica-at-ericasadun.com/>> wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
>>>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>> “each” is just what's required to make “so” read sensibly.
>>>>>
>>>>> (0..<100).filter(so: isPrime)
>>>>>
>>>>> doesn't make any obvious sense.
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't there be a term of art exemption for `filter(_:)`. Otherwise why
>>>> not use `select(where:)`.
>>>
>>> Because `where(...)` is better. But all such changes are out of scope
>>> here.
>>
>> Are you asking/suggesting that it be in scope somewhere else or merely
>> removing it from the
>> conversation as tangential?
>
> Yes, as I've been saying, we should take up the basenames of functional
> methods, considering whether the terms of art should be considered
> sacred cows, as a separate proposal.
>
> --
> Dave
A or B?
Yes.
-- E, moo
p.s. I'll start a thread
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
