Regards
(From mobile)

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 11:59 PM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> “The access modifier of an extension sets the default modifier of its members 
> which has no modifier applied to them.”

I get it now.. "which do not have their own localy defined modifier"
> public extension SomeType {
>     func extensionMember() {}
> }
> “If there the extension has no access modifier, then the default modifier of 
> its members which has no explicit modifier will be internal if the extended 
> type is either public or internal, or it will be private when the extended 
> type is private(analogous for fileprivate).”
> // First
> public/internal struct A {}
> 
> extension A {
>      
>     /* internal */ func member() {}
> }
> 
> // Second
> private struct B {}
> 
> extension B {
>      
>     /* private */ func member() {}
> }
> My English isn’t great, please don’t blame me for that. Feel free to correct 
> me. I’d appreciate that. :)
> 
I didn't, i just asked for clarification (i truly did not get the meaning). 


> But more importantly, I was under the impression that Doug had hinted that 
> private (or likely more generally scoped) conformance on extension was a 
> slipery slope with important impact on runtime performance.
> I’m not an expert in this area, I really cannot tell. And I don’t want to dig 
> in all these thousands of emails to find his talk. FWIW not every proposal 
> does know the impact which will happen behind the scene. Even some simple 
> change might have a huge impact (I don’t say this proposal is simple).
> 
I am no expert myself. I just happened to remember what looked like a partial 
answer. The generic manifesto has a section on 'Private Conformances' that 
gives some interesting clues about what's involved in scoping extension based 
conformances.

> My personal vision of the access control is clarity and consistency. It would 
> be much easier to have the same access control behavior on extensions like on 
> classes, enums and structs.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adrian Zubarev
> Sent with Airmail
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to