Just a quick clarification: I was under impression that the utility of Boolean 
was that one could extend any type to behave as a boolean type and thus be used 
in control flow constructions etc. Not something that has to do often, but nice 
to have nevertheless. I would be sad if this functionality were to go. At the 
same time, I understand the rationale behind this proposal. Maybe we could 
introduce something like CustomBoolConvertible instead (if not yet suggested)?

Best, 

 Taras


> On 29 Jun 2016, at 08:44, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Swift community,
> 
> The review of SE-0109 "Remove the Boolean protocol" begins now and runs 
> through July 4, 2016. The proposal is available here:
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0109-remove-boolean.md
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0109-remove-boolean.md>
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> 
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
> manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of 
> the message:
> 
> Proposal link:
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0109-remove-boolean.md
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0109-remove-boolean.md>
> Reply text
> 
> Other replies
>  <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What 
> goes into a review?
> 
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
> answer in your review:
> 
> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
> Swift?
> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do 
> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or 
> an in-depth study?
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md 
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
> Thank you,
> 
> -Doug
> 
> Review Manager
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to