You are being apprehensive about this. We all want grouping of access modifiers
just like c++ has but what you are proposing doesn't seem to be a clear win. In
fact I would much rather have plain c++ groupings than group{}.
Could you also "replay all" not just the evolution list? It makes it hard to
follow threads.
-1 from me as well, sorry. You should bring this additive change up again for
discussion in August though.
> On Jun 29, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 what an argument! This doesn’t help here in any way.
>
> If you think there must be a solution for the problem you mentioned in your
> first reply here, feel free to propose for no more implicit access modifier.
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Zubarev
> Sent with Airmail
>
> Am 29. Juni 2016 um 20:24:26, L. Mihalkovic ([email protected])
> schrieb:
>
>> If I recall, there was even a past argument from a core team member (chris?)
>> about something different but alluding to a very similar
>> lack-of-practicality-at-scale.
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
