On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:36 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2016, at 1:33 PM, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:54 PM, John McCall via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Jun 29, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Vladimir.S <[email protected]> wrote: >> > How about `public(extensible)` ? >> >> Hmm. I started to work out an example with these as separate modifiers, >> and I think I understand the need to combine them in some way. >> >> I wonder if just "extensible" would be good enough. It is a term that's >> used in API descriptions. >> > > This particular word is unfortunate because it has nothing to do with an > extension, which shares the same etymological root. > > > I agree, but I'm not sure that it's particularly confusing in practice. > Why not just "inheritable"? That is, after all, what we mean, no? John. >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
