Just want to brought some things/questions that was not reflected in
proposal and that I think should be mentioned:
1. Should we be able to have such syntax to de-couple tuple's values in
parameter of closure:
let a : ((Int, Int, Int)) -> Int = { ((x, y, z)) in return x + y + z }
or only as single parameter
let a : ((Int, Int, Int)) -> Int = { x in return x.0 + x.1 + x.2 }
2. Currently type of `(Int,Int)->()` is actually `((Int,Int))->()`
typealias t1 = (Int, Int) -> Int
print(t1.self) // ((Int, Int)) -> Int
the proposal should change this to:
print(t1.self) // (Int, Int) -> Int
where `((Int, Int)) -> Int` means one tuple argument
3. It seems like we should keep the ability to explicitly convert one
function type to another as some(many?) code can depend on this current
behavior and so we need a way to convert old code to new.
I.e. I think such construction should work:
var a : ((Int, Int, Int)) -> Int = { x in return x.0 + x.1 + x.2 }
a = { x, y, z in return x + y + z} as ((Int, Int, Int)) -> Int
and
var b : (Int, Int, Int) -> Int = { x, y, z in return x + y + z }
b = { x in return x.0 + y.1 + z.2} as (Int, Int, Int) -> Int
Opinions/thoughts?
On 30.06.2016 21:22, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution wrote:
Hello Swift community,
The review of "SE-0110: Distinguish between single-tuple and multiple-argument
function types" begins now and runs through July 4. The proposal is available here:
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0110-distingish-single-tuple-arg.md
Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews
should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review
manager.
What goes into a review?
The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through
constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift. When writing
your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
* What is your evaluation of the proposal?
* Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change
to Swift?
* Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
* If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature,
how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
* How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick
reading, or an in-depth study?
More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
Thank you,
-Chris Lattner
Review Manager
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
