> On Jul 3, 2016, at 9:04 AM, Anton Zhilin via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@...> writes: > >> Hi Anton, >> >> This looks correct, but what is the proposal “for”? This seems like it > is just encoding what SE-0066 was about. >> >> -Chris > > Questions about that proposal are often risen on the list. > Some think that we will still be able to supply () argument > to () -> T functions. > > To clear that up completely, I suggest adding this grammar change > to SE-0066 or one of the newer proposals. Key idea is that parentheses > are part of function type grammar and have nothing common with tuples > or unit type.
Sure, that makes sense to me. Please submit a PR that expands on SE-0066 when this settles, I don’t think we need another review cycle. Thank you! -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
