On 03.07.2016 23:04, Haravikk wrote:
On 3 Jul 2016, at 20:03, Vladimir.S <[email protected]> wrote:
But, then, regarding the consistency and confusion, I have a question:
is it expected that func f() {..} will *return* `Void` ? I believe it
is not expected exactly at the same level as Void in parameter for 0
argument function. I.e. should `-> ()` still means "returns Void" or
"returns nothing" ?
Fair question, personally I never use () to indicate void on the return
side, and always specify the return type, so there's never any doubt
what I meant, but that's just convention at the moment. I wouldn't mind
seeing one style of void return being forced for consistency, but that's
probably out of scope for this issue. It seems vaguely familiar though,
has an issue already come up about removing the redundancy?
As stated in another thread, there will be no changes regarding meaning of
`func f(){}` and `->()` - the same implicit(or explicit, as one wish) Void
result.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
