> On 4 Jul 2016, at 09:14, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 3, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Gabriel Lanata via swift-evolution
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, this has been proposed multiple times before in different ways.
>
> It has indeed. Unfortunately, for various reasons it did not get into review
> in time, and Swift 3 is basically closed to additive features at this point.
> Our last pull request to get it reviewed has now been tagged "out of scope
> for current release". <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/114>
>
>> The proposed solution is to implement a native `.cases` static var for all
>> enumerations without associated values.
>
>
> That was one of many things we discussed in previous threads. `cases` isn't
> good because the natural variable you'd want to use in a `for` loop is `case`:
>
> for case in PokemonType.cases { … }
>
> And also because other types which aren't technically enums, such as `Bool`,
> may want to expose their "cases" through the same mechanism.
>
Now that you mention it; why is Bool not an enum?
Karl
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
