On Fri, Jul 01 2016 at 05:53:13 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0114-buffer-naming.md
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1; Header is much more clear than Value in describing the purpose of the property. I did have to double check the docs to be sure Header meant what I thought it did---which made me wonder if Metadata would be a more instructional name, but I do like Header. > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? Yes, to me the Element array is the value of the buffer, so Value was a bad name for this metadata property; Header is a much better name than Value. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of > Swift? Yes, increased clarity. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? If have not dealt with this on a language level, but I have implemented similar protocols at a user-framework level and would not use Value to name this property. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a > quick reading, or an in-depth study? Quick review, not much effort needed as it was simple to see the old name was unclear and a poor description of the property. -- Roth Michaels [email protected] _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
