> On Jul 6, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Leonardo Pessoa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Scott, you really got a point here: should this proposal pass, I > believe the final keyword should be removed as it would be already the > default behaviour and thus unnecessary. I don't think this is on the > proposal. >
Removing the `final` keyword would mean there would be no way to have a class of `internal` (default) scope that subclasses and another class of `internal` (default) scope and overrides a method of `internal` (default) scope. Scott _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
