> > What is your evaluation of the proposal? > +1
> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to > Swift? > Yes, the current situation of defining a protocol required operator function globally is potentially confusing and feels inconsistent. > Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > Yup. How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or > an in-depth study? A reading. One thing that's not completely clear to me: if you implement the operator function as a class method and override it in a subclass, in what situation would the overridden version be called?
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
