Really happy to see this proposal. It will cut build times for packages that
use my library significantly.
The only point I would bring up is about using a `Bool` for `isPrivate`. This
obviously only gives us 2 levels of access control. Something like this would
give more flexibility:
enum AccessControl {
case .public
case .private
}
Target(name: "SampleCLI", dependencies: ["FooCore"], access: .private)
Packages could possibly want more fine grained control over the access control.
e.g, Package Foo wants only packages that directly depend on Foo to receive a
module, but not packages that depend on a package Bar that depends on Foo. This
would be much easier to add as an additional case to the `enum AccessControl`
but impossible to add for `isPrivate: Bool`
Thanks Ankit for the great proposal!
Tanner_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
