I don't remember any "Accepted"-announcement that had such a large thread ;-) Afair from the original discussion, there is nothing inherently wrong with labels — it's just that they are handled in a suboptimal way. Assuming that the "board" made an informed decision, it's probably better to accept 0111 and start a proposal for a new implementation of labeled closure parameters… maybe I'm to naive, but I hope that after Swift 3 those labels will return (accompanied by tuple-splat and currying ;-) _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
Re: [swift-evolution] [Accepted] SE-0111: Remove type system significance of function argument labels
Tino Heth via swift-evolution Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:48:04 -0700
- Re: [swift-ev... David Owens II via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Austin Zheng via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Mark Lacey via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... David Owens II via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... David Owens II via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Austin Zheng via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... David Owens II via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Charlie Monroe via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Pyry Jahkola via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Accepted] SE-011... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Accepted] SE-011... Thorsten Seitz via swift-evolution
