> On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why not just OutputStream.stderr?
Can you do an extension like that with state for a protocol? -- E > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 14:25 Erica Sadun via swift-evolution > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Just throwing this here. Unfortunately `Stream` is already taken (and tied to > Foundation). > > public struct StdStream { > public struct StderrStream: OutputStream { > public func write(_ string: String) { fputs(string, Darwin.stderr) } > } > > public struct StdoutStream: OutputStream { > public func write(_ string: String) { fputs(string, Darwin.stdout) } > } > > public static var err = StderrStream() > public static var out = StdoutStream() > } > > So in use, it would look something like > > str.write(to: &StdStream.out) > str.write(to: &StdStream.err) > > I also considered DarwinStream (seemed too on the nose), UnixStream, > Streamfd, BSDStream, etc. Didn't like any of them. > > -- E, have paintbrush will bikeshed
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
