> On Jul 11, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: > > As for all of the other additive changes, I would strongly prefer you to > *wait* on even proposing or discussing these things until after the Swift 3.0 > evolution cycle is done. Not only is it distracting for the community, but > the core team and many others won’t be be able to even read the thread or the > responses, thus your discussion cycle will be lacking key input. > > On this topic, we specifically discussed this when labeled breaks were being > designed, and when they were expanded to “do” in Swift 2. We specifically > decided to allow break but not continue, because we didn’t want these control > flow statements to be “another way to spell a loop”. > > -Chris
So I can take it as a given that this is out of scope for Swift 3 too? https://gist.github.com/erica/a78045d09fa5bb20e6e566295140c84d <https://gist.github.com/erica/a78045d09fa5bb20e6e566295140c84d> -- E
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
