On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Ben Rimmington <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This will restore the ability to express the idea of a closure parameter >> that carries labels as part of its declaration, without requiring parameter >> labels to be part of the type system (allowing, e.g. the operator + to be >> passed into something that requires parameter labels). > > During the review, Michael Ilseman suggested using SE-0021 for declaration > names. > > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/22488/focus=22580 > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/22488/focus=22580>> > > Your example "op(lhs:,rhs:)" would be "op(lhs:rhs:)" instead (i.e. without > the comma).
Ok, sure. I just trying to outline what the proposal would look like, -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
