Thanks! I will take a look Brandon
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > You might have a look at our discussion thread. There is a huge overlap on > your bikeshedding. > > https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon–20160711/024439.html > > > > -- > Adrian Zubarev > Sent with Airmail > > Am 15. Juli 2016 um 21:25:50, Brandon Knope via swift-evolution > ([email protected]) schrieb: > >> July 27th is last day for breaking source changes for Swift 3...so I thought >> I would bring this up one final time. >> >> Opinions: >> - .self and .Self do not adequately convey what they do without some mental >> gymnastics >> - self has somewhat two meanings (accessing a property on the type and >> getting the type of the object) >> - We can get into a funky situation where we have self.someVar.self which >> looks odd (though symmetric!) >> - What do we call these two selves? Postfix and prefix self? (I.e. Is it >> googleable?) >> >> >> Ideas: >> - rename to .type and .Type >> - more bikeshedding? There has to be a better way to express these types >> other than .self and .Self >> >> Brandon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
