+1. Agreed. A minor but a clear improvement for clarity and consistency. - David
On 16 Jul 2016, at 07:54, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? > > +1 > >> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a >> change to Swift? > > Yes, minor but important. > >> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > > Yes, it's consistent with other existing APIs, and it's intuitive. > > >> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar >> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? > > N/A > >> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick >> reading, or an in-depth study? > > Quick reading of the proposal. > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
