> On Jul 20, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Tino Heth via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Am 20.07.2016 um 18:20 schrieb L. Mihalkovic <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >>> So my advice: Be glad that you don't see such problems in your real work >>> life, and hope that the extremists who would like to completely remove >>> classic object orientation and cripple Swift to fully match their ideals >>> don't prevail ;-) >> >> That ship has sailed... it is now just a matter of the implementation >> details... My hopes are now on google forking swift like they did to webkit >> and dalvik. It won't save the apps, bug it would the servers. > ;-) nay, that's a little bit to pessimistic for me: > After all, even with SE-0117, you can still write nice code with Swift — it > just will be less fun :( > > Afaics, there is constant pressure to turn Swift into a language for fools, “ Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.
" > rather than a language that helps us avoiding foolish mistakes… but so far, > Swift got more things right for me than any of the alternatives. > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
