> On Jul 20, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Garth Snyder via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> However, the current notation of -> Type being used to declare an input
> parameter to set {} just strikes me as weird and wrong. The symbol -> means
> “returns a” or “yields”. Since we’re declaring a type that might be either
> inbound or outbound, the neutral : is more appropriate.
If, as seems likely for lens support, we eventually supported inout functions:
func foo(x: Int) -> inout String {
get { return myStr }
set { myStr = newValue }
}
Would you feel differently about having `:` on subscript returns? Or would you
want to use `:` on inout functions, too?
--
Brent Royal-Gordon
Architechies
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
