> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Quite frankly, I think the ship has long sailed for renaming Void.

Agree.  I’m not advocating change, just stating things that should be 
considered if anyone wants to propose it.

> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> > On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Daniel Steinberg via swift-evolution 
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > This may be a silly question - given that one of Swift’s design principles 
> > is to be a language for new programmers and for APIs to read like English 
> > phrases, should we replace the typealias of Void for the return type () 
> > with Nothing.
> 
> Nothing was one of the names considered for the bottom type that replaces 
> @noreturn 
> (https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0102-noreturn-bottom-type.md
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0102-noreturn-bottom-type.md>).
>  I think it would be confusing to rename Void to Nothing.
> 
> If we consider renaming it Unit is the obvious way to go 
> (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_type 
> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_type>)
> 
> >
> > So
> >
> > f: ( input: Int) -> Void
> >
> > becomes
> >
> > f: ( input: Int) -> Nothing
> >
> > Instead of saying “f takes an Int and returns a Void” I read this as “f 
> > takes an Int and returns nothing”.
> >
> > I’ve been using f:(input: Int) -> () because it’s easier to explain than 
> > Void to non-experienced programmers. Experienced programmers have no 
> > problem with Void. But Void seems to be something we’re using just because 
> > we have for a while - like x++ and C-style for loops.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Daniel
> > _______________________________________________
> > swift-evolution mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
> > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to