https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0090-remove-dot-self.md
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Boris Wang <kona.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > just write code in playground： > struct MyStruct ｛ > var t = 0 > ｝ > sizeof(MyStruct) > > Compiler error： > Missing '.self' for reference to metatype of type 'MyStruct' > > The metatype is from swift it self! > > What the hell was the .self? > > > Jose Cheyo Jimenez via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org>于2016年7月24日 > 周日04:45写道： >> I'm finding it really hard to see the advantage of this proposal with out >> reconciling the possibility of .self going away. I think this should be >> postponed after .self is reviewed in swift 4. Premature optimization imo. >> >>> On Jul 22, 2016, at 3:20 PM, David Hart via swift-evolution >>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >>> >>> Where do these double generics come from? Never saw them... >>> >>>> On 22 Jul 2016, at 17:54, Anton Zhilin <antonyzhi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> 2016-07-22 18:51 GMT+03:00 David Hart <da...@hartbit.com>: >>>>> Isn't the solution to a lot of these issues allowing explicit >>>>> generalization instead of this meta type business? >>>> >>>> And what would you suggest for "double generics" in initializers? >>>> ExampleType<Int><Double>() // not good >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-evolution mailing list >>> swift-evolution@swift.org >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
