On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Ted F.A. van Gaalen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Austin, thank you, please see inline > ? > I have explained this many times before, didn’t I? > > Its removal causes a very crucial limitation/change in the way > one writes programs, So writing about this for;; subject is > very, very different from long discussions like those about > allowing a comma at the end of a list or not… > because removing the for;; has a very heavy impact. > > Furthermore, IMHO the decision to remove the for;; was based > on very subjective loose and partly irrelevant criteria. > > I don't care how good your reasons are, the fact of the matter is that it was extensively discussed, a decision was made, and it is now a done deal. Please remember that these are high-traffic lists that many people subscribe to; complaining about the C for loop is a waste of everybody's time. At the very least, please respect the process and put together a proposal that we can all discuss, instead of asking Chris or whoever to step in and make an exception because you don't like it. Austin > For example the suggestion, that experienced > programmer will refrain from using the for;; > was ridiculous. It’s a bit like assuming that a technicians > will not use a screw drivers anymore.. > > I’ve wrote about this extensively before. > > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
