> On Jul 30, 2016, at 1:48 PM, Ted F.A. van Gaalen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> thanks for the tip about Hirundo app!
> 
> A positive side-effect of removing the classical for;; loop
>  (yes, it’s me saying this :o)  is that it forces me to find
> a good and generic equivalent for it, 
> making the conversion of my for;;s to 3.0 easier.
> which is *not* based on collections or sequences and
> does not rely on deeper calls to Sequence etc.

Hi Ted,

I know that you’re very passionate about the removal of C style for loops, but 
any direction to add back features to compensate for them will need to wait 
until Stage 2 of Swift 4’s planning cycle.

-Chris

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to