That's a good point. :)

> On Aug 2, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm going to guess, since Musa mentioned science and engineering, that a good 
> chunk of that work is floating point :)
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Charlie Monroe via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Are you using the variants of operators without overflow check? I.e.
> 
> let num = a &+ b // [1]
> 
> [1] 
> https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Swift/Conceptual/Swift_Programming_Language/AdvancedOperators.html
>  
> <https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Swift/Conceptual/Swift_Programming_Language/AdvancedOperators.html>
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 2, 2016, at 3:01 AM, Muse M <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Have always wonder why Maths in Swift is slower than C and Go, it should be 
>> address with priority if Swift is to be adopt for engineering, financial and 
>> science industry.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Charlie Monroe via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> See 
>> https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160725/025711.html
>>  
>> <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160725/025711.html>
>> 
>> From what I understand, the discussion should stay focused on the main 
>> topics for Swift 4 that Chris highlighted in 
>> https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160725/025676.html
>>  
>> <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160725/025676.html>
>> 
>> I had several ideas in mind, but am postponing them for Swift 5, seeing the 
>> schedule...
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 1, 2016, at 8:48 PM, Anton Zhilin via swift-evolution 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It was stated that 27th of July was the last date for proposal acceptance, 
>>> 29th of July was the last day for implementation, and 1th of August should 
>>> be the starting day of Swift 3.1-related discussions.
>>> Am I right? Should we begin?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to