> Since RangeExpression is a protocol compatible with any index type, it has to > have an associated type I haven't read all linked information, but would the situation change with generic protocols? Thinks like "AnyGenerator" afaics would be superfluous if we had "protocol Generator<Type>", and the same might be true for RangeExpression. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
Re: [swift-evolution] [Idea] Generic subscripts
Tino Heth via swift-evolution Wed, 03 Aug 2016 01:59:04 -0700
- [swift-evolution] [Idea] Generic s... Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Idea] ... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Id... Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution]... Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Idea] ... Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Id... Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Idea] ... Chris Lattner via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [Idea] ... Haravikk via swift-evolution
