> On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Will Field-Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would rather see a Swift-centric rethinking of serialization than having > the runtime dynamically register Objective-C classes anytime I want to > serialize something. Plus, that seems like it's leaving Linux users out in > the cold for serialization — although I'm primarily a macOS/iOS user, so > maybe there's something I don't know about the corelibs Foundation > implementation.
I do hope that it will *also* become possible to access a Swift type in pure Swift given a name and a protocol it conforms to, which would allow Corelibs Foundation to also support NSCoding on value types. But that's a separate issue from improving Objective-C bridging. -- Brent Royal-Gordon Architechies _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
