Strong +1 On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Haravikk via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > - What is your evaluation of the proposal? > > +1, like others I would love to have this feature available today, as my > code is currently littered with complicated constraints on types that could > be much more elegantly handled by constraints on the associated types > themselves. > > > - Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > > Definitely, this seems like an important next step for Swift's support of > generics and constraints. > > > - Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > > Yes, absolutely. > > > - How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? > > I've read through it fairly quickly, but I feel I already have a pretty > good grasp of what the feature entails as it solves a problem I encounter > often! > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
