> On Sep 26, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, and I think moving towards a more dynamic Swift now without > as-of-yet-seen significant justification would be a mistake. Swift should be > as static as possible. We should be making every attempt to pare down the > existing runtime and quietly transition those that rely on dynamism to > checked reflection (yes, that is not in fact an oxymoron). The more the > compiler knows about your program, the better it does. Period. > How would you implement something like Core Data in pure Swift on the server where the Obj-C runtime is not available?
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
