> On 5 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Haravikk via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree with Tim; I'm a +1 for switch! for a convenient means of erroring > out, but I think switch? is a bit too different from normal usage of the > question-mark. > > One other alternative might be if there could be some kind of switch else > syntax, kind of like a guard statement, allowing options on what to do? Only > problem is how best to structure it, as the use of break might confusing as > to its scope, like so: > > switch(foo) else break { // Break from the switch, or the enclosing > block?
We already have that in default, The syntax is different, but at least the meaning of break is unambiguous. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
