Hi,
I agree removing the "case" word after the "if" / "guard", but I prefer
removing it completely rather then make it optional to limit the number
of different implementation.
Regarding the operator, I agree that it can be improved because we
should find something that contains two different operations:
- check against the pattern
- assign the value
For me both "is" and "match" miss one of the two part: the "is" keyword
doesn't feel like a check against the pattern to me, while the "match"
keyboard doesn't contain information regarding the assignation.
+1 for Erika proposal, I like the idea of using "~=", it explicits both
operations and it is an operator already used in Swift for a similar
use-case.
Marco
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
