I'm a +1 on the feature, though for simply handling symmetry it's not a super 
critical issue.


I wonder though, when you start looking at symmetry is it worth looking at 
other patterns? For example, could symmetrical operators be covered by a 
broader multi-part operator definition?

I was thinking recently it would be convenient if I could define say a 
3-dimensional point like so: <x, y, z>

In this case you're looking at a symmetric operator with two different 
components (opening and closing angle brackets) with the ability to take three 
arguments. Is there a way we could define and implement something along these 
lines? If so it would be very flexible, and potential allow us to unify all 
operators into a single format.

For example, you can thing of a prefix operator as being a leading symbol plus 
one argument, while a postfix is one argument plus a trailing symbol, a binary 
operator is an argument, a symbol and another argument, a symmetric operator is 
a leading symbol, an argument and a trailing symbol (doesn't have to be 
identical).

If we had a means of specifying operators in this way (as a complete pattern) 
we could do away with special cases of operators entirely, though they may be 
worth keeping for compatibility and as a shorthand.

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 09:57, Dimitri Racordon via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> I think the use cases are not that sparse actually.
> I would also argue that it would be easier to understand the intent of the 
> code with some sort of keyword than with a hard copy of each function.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 14 Nov 2016, at 10:51, Anton Zhilin via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> -1
>> Not worth adding syntactic sugar for a narrow use case. Plus it's an 
>> additive feature.
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to