on Sat Nov 26 2016, David Sweeris <davesweeris-AT-mac.com> wrote: >> On Nov 26, 2016, at 17:19, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Just gotta field a version of that proposal that doesn’t “look like Haskell” >> :) > Is there something wrong with Haskell's approach to imports? I don't > know how they do it, so I'm unaware of any pros/cons to their > approach. The ":)" makes me think I'm missing something... > >> Seriously, though, would there be any objection to restoring the old >> behavior of just silently ignoring perfect duplicates of operator >> definitions across frameworks sans proposal? > Yeah, it could silently change how statements get evaluated, if I > start writing code using one library's operators, then import a 3rd > library which defines the same operators but with different > precedences.
differnt precedences => not perfect duplicates, right? -- -Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
