-1 will just bring mess and unclearness. It can work with Java-like approach where a package is a folder. Since we have no strict decisions for that - please, don't do it.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 at 21:10 Gonçalo Alvarez Peixoto via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > @Jim > > You most certainly offended no one! Quite the opposite. This being an open > source community, every contribution counts and, imho, you did nothing but > to *contribute *to swift's evolution! > > Thanks for backing typeprivate proposal. We have been looking for ways to > restructure our proposal based on all the fine arguments raised by everyone > during the discussion, however we have not found time to complete it. We > will definitely keep in touch in the following days. I believe your > proposal really relates to ours. The real urge is to revisit access level > controls, if need it be, and create finer grained modifiers for better > communication. > > @Derrick > > This being said, the solution might even reduce the number of access > control modifiers and not just add one more to the pile. I think we all aim > to have the right amount of modifiers for the right amount of use cases. > Should they be organised and designed in a way that better conveys their > intent, then I believe the number will not be the number one problem. > > @Tino > > I do agree with you. It is sometimes hard to keep track of all the > proposals/discussions being raised. While I do believe this is an open > enough forum for everyone to participate in, it can become quite hard to > have the full spectrum of discussions in sight at first glance. > > Best, > Gonçalo > > 2016-12-08 18:51 GMT+00:00 Tino Heth <[email protected]>: > > Hi Jim, > > > > > > > This is my first use of this forum. I certainly did not mean to cause > pain for anyone. > > > > > > I hope I didn't sound as if I was blaming you — imho it is not realistic > to keep track of the evolution process as it is organised now, so even > exact repetition is rather common > > > > > > > At Gonzalo's invitation I have looked over the thread for his proposal > and I am withdrawing my request and backing his with a very heavy +1. > > > This one? > https://github.com/goncaloalvarez/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-introduce-typeprivate-access-control-level.md > > > > > > > If I have offended anyone I ask their forgiveness. Since you mentioned > it I will state that the Xcode approach to project groups is one that I > have yet to understand the merit of. > > > > Gonzalo: please let me know how I can assist you. > > > I don't think anyone is offended, and imho your offer to Gonzalo is a good > move (it's just sad that there is no established tool for such > collaboration) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > swift-evolution mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
