Hi Swift community,

I’d like to talk to about current Self keyword. If I’m not totally mistaken 
then the current Self has a few meanings:

Refer to the current type, or refer to the dynamic type for non-final classes 
inside containing type (SE–0068 - not yet implemented).
For non-final class types use Self as return type on the conforming super type 
(or return an instance of receiver Self).
Let me visualize the behaviors quickly in some short code snippet:

protocol Foo {
    func foo(_ f: Self) -> Self
}

class A : Foo {
    // forced to use `A` as parameter type and `Self` as return type
    func foo(_ f: A) -> Self { return self }
    // Returning `A()` would cause an error: Cannot convert return expression 
of type 'A' to return type 'Self'
    func bar() -> A { return A() /* or self */ }
    func zoo() -> Self { return /* only */ self }
}

class B : A {
    // Both is fine `B` or `Self` as the return type
    // If `B` is used you can return a different instance like `B()`
    // `Self` does only allow `self` to be used here
    override func foo(_ f: A) -> B { return self }
}

struct D : Foo {
    // No `Self` allowed here at all
    func foo(_ f: D) -> D { return self /* or D() */ }
}
The behavior of Self is a little magical, because it sometimes refers to the 
current type it is used in, or it has a contract of using self.

I propose of introducing a new keyword called Current to solve a few problems 
here.

Self on parameter types would be disallowed for protocol members, because 
conformances to that protocol already disallow that (see A above). Instead one 
would use Current and get the correct meaning.

protocol Boo {
    func boo(_ b: Current) -> Self
}
     
procotol Loo {
    func loo() -> Current
}
     
class X : Boo, Loo {
    func boo(_ b: X) -> Self { return self }
    func loo() -> X { return self /* or X() */ }
}
     
final class Y : Boo {
    func boo(_ b: X) -> Y { return self /* or Y */ }
}
Using Self inside the containing type would always mean as one would refer to 
the dynamic type, like the magical syntax function type(of:) does.

Current can only refer to the current containing type.

On classes Self has always the contract of returning self.

Self could be discouraged in favor of Current on value types, as a shorthand to 
refer to the containing type.

Generics could benefit from Current too:

extension AReallyLongNonFinalClassName {
    func casted<T : Current>() -> T { ... }
}
// `Self` wouldn't here, because it would refer to the dynamic type
#1 Would affect a lot of protocols which implies that it would affect ABI.

These are the first ideas I had in my mind. We can polish it further if it 
receives positive and constructive feedback.

Best regards,



-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to