> On Jan 10, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Stephen Celis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 10, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> It’s a nontrivial new user-facing feature with new syntax in the language,
>> so it’ll need a proposal. ‘twould be good for the proposal to link to the
>> JIRA ticket.
>>
>> - Doug
>
> I was under the impression that it was part of the "Complete Generics" goal,
> specifically here:
> https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#generic-subscripts
>
> <https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#generic-subscripts>
The “generics manifesto” is a set of ideas that are *heavily* biased by my own
goals for the generics system. They’re not plan-of-record, and some might even
be terrible ideas for Swift. Each thing there still needs to go through the
usual swift-evolution process to get proper design treatment before becoming a
part of the language, and I expect that process to flush out better
ideas/problems with those ideas/unexpected interactions/etc.
> Will most of the other unimplemented points need proposals, as well?
Yes.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
