> On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Charlie Monroe via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1. Why? Why not use foo2 instead? Is ' so much better? > > Instead, I'd personally love better character support in Swift in the future > and allow a Character literals using ' - just like in C, except with Unicode > support: > > let myChar = 'x' // Character > let myChar2 = '∃' // Character > let myChar3 = '\0' // NUL Character > let myChar4 = 'xyz' // Error from compiler
These aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. If we require that an identifier can't start with an apostrophe, then we can support identifiers named `x'` and `'x'` as some kind of literal simultaneously. I'm sympathetic to this since I personally find x', x'', etc. more attractive than x2, x3, etc. for totally superficial math weenie reasons, but although the surface level language design is fairly straightforward, the downstream tooling impact is nontrivial—we'd need a mangling for ' in symbol names, simplified parsing tools would need to cope with ', tools that attempt to parse out identifiers from error messages would have to deal with apostrophe-unsafe output, etc. Not sure it's worth it. -Joe _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
