Thanks for pointing this out Tim. I had actually read the whole thread but over a few days between other things and must have missed the relevant updates.
I think you may be reacting to the very first draft. `extension` isn't used > at all in the newest draft, and no code can exist outside the enum. In > fact, there's a fair amount of similarity to your idea in the newest > proposal. > > https://gist.github.com/timshadel/5a5a8e085a6fd591483a933e603c2562 > > Oh yes - this is much better! Lovely in fact. Although it does lose the benefit of at-a-glance understanding of the cases present in the enum when they are on one line each (when the code gets bigger than in the example they will be quite a way apart).
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
