> On Jan 12, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Slava Pestov via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> Before I submit it, could someone let me know if adding generics to 
>> subscripts would influence the ABI? ( still feel pretty clueless in that 
>> area).
> It won’t change the ABI of existing subscript calls, but if the standard 
> library introduces new generic subscripts that replace older non-generic 
> subscripts, it will impact ABI.

Specifically, we currently have to have a _Hashable protocol that has a 
_toAnyHashable() method in order to implement Dictionary<AnyHashable,*> 
subscripting using concrete types as keys. A replacement subscript that was 
generic over all Hashable types would solve this more neatly, and would be 
source-compatible, but affects the ABI of the stdlib. 


Generic subscripts would also make it easier to implement one-sided ranges e.g. 

        myCollection[i...] // slice from i to the end

swift-evolution mailing list

Reply via email to