I like it.
Inicio del mensaje reenviado: > De: Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <[email protected]> > Fecha: 16 de enero de 2017, 5:15:23 PM GMT+1 > Para: [email protected] > Asunto: Re: [swift-evolution] Reduce with inout > Responder a: Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> > > >> on Mon Jan 16 2017, Chris Eidhof <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> How does everyone feel about adding a second version of `reduce` to >> `Sequence`? Instead of a `combine` function that's of type `(A, Element) -> >> A`, it would be `(inout A, Element) -> ()`. This way, we can write nice >> functionals algorithms, but have the benefits of inout (mutation within the >> function, and hopefully some copy eliminations). >> >> IIRC, Loïc Lecrenier first asked this on Twitter. I've been using it ever >> since, because it can really improve readability (the possible performance >> gain is nice, too). >> >> Here's `reduce` with an `inout` parameter, including a sample: >> https://gist.github.com/chriseidhof/fd3e9aa621569752d1b04230f92969d7 > > +1 > > -- > -Dave > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
